respective written address and the case was thereafter adjourned for judgment. The defence counsel in their adopted written, formulated one {1} issue for determination and is hereby reproduced below as follows:“Whether going by the totality of the evidence adduced by the prosecution against the defendants, the prosecution has discharged the burden of proving the alleged offences of armed robbery grievous hurt and conspiracy contrary to sections 298, 247 and 97 of the penal code respectively.” The prosecuting counsel also formulated one {1} issue for determination in their adopted written address and is hereby reproduced below as follows:“Has the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt regards been had to the evidence adduced before this Honourable Court.” For the purpose of this judgment, this court has decided to hybrid the two {2} issues formulated by counsel in the following words:“Whether from the totality of the evidence adduced before the court, the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the defendant.” The case of the prosecution against the defendants is as presented by the evidence of the three {3} prosecution witnesses, and the facts upon which the charges were framed against the defendants, are as contained in three {3} charges earlier reproduced above in this judgment. Page 4 of 18