marked as exhibits B, B1, C, C1, D and D1 respectively which was further substantiated by exhibits A and A1 which are the iron rods. From the evidence of PW2, the statements of the defendants admitted as exhibits B, B1, C, C1, D, D1 and the 2 iron rods marked as exhibits A and A1, it has become very obvious that a robbery incident did actually occurred against PW2 by the defendants during which they carted away with his motorcycle after beating him with iron rods to a state of unconsciousness. I therefore agree with the prosecuting counsel that the prosecution has proved all the elements of the offence of robbery against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt as required by law and found the defendants guilty as charged. Having earlier held that the prosecution has proved all the elements of the three {3} offences with which the defendants were arraigned before this Honourable Court, it automatically follows that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt as required by law. - Ajayi V. State {2013} 5JSCQLR pII p 631 - Ikaria V. State {2013} 8NCC248 - Alabi V. State{1993}7NWLR pt 307 p 511 Consequently upon the foregoing, I resolve the sole issue formulated in favour of the prosecution and against the defendants Accordingly the prosecution having proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the defendants in respect of the offences of criminal conspiracy, causing grievous hurt and robbery contrary to sections 97, 248(2) and 298 (c) of the penal code, with which the defendants were arraigned before this court, I hereby find you (1)Abdulmuminu Yusuf Page 15 of 18