- Obakpolor V. State (1991) 1 SCNJ 91. - Ugwumba V. State (1993) 6 SCNJ 217. - Eyisi V. State (2001) 18 WRN 10 SC. Prosecuting counsel further submitted that the statement of the defendant is confessional in nature and that a confessional statement can be relied upon to convict a defendant. - Badamasi V. State (1996) 6 NWLR Pt 196 P 182. - Idowu V. State (2000) 12 NWLR Pt 608 P 48. - Arogundare V. State (2009) NWLR Pt 705 P 165. - Ibrahim Kamila V. State (2018) ALL FWLR Pt 965 P 1 at 27. It was the submission of the prosecuting counsel that the allegation of involuntariness of the confessional statement of the defendant cannot hold because it was not made at the appropriate time, and that the issue having been raised by the defendant while giving evidence as DW1 is inconsequential. - Odeh V. FRN (2008) ALL FWLR Pt 424 P 1590. - Muhammad V. State (2015) 11 NCC 481 at 490. Prosecuting counsel finally concluded by urging this court to hold that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and convict the defendant as charged. By paragraph 3.01 of their adopted written address, the defence counsel submitted that the prosecution has failed woefully to prove the offences with which the 1st defendant is charged beyond reaonble doubt as required by law. - Salabi V. State (1993) 7 NWLR Pt 307 P 511. - Ikaria V. State (2014) 1 NWLR Pt 1389 P 639. Page 4 of 14