The Response of the investigation activities were tendered Exhibits “B” and “D” respectively. It is furher the evidence of PW1 that the team of investigators invited some private individuals i.e (PW2, PW4 and PW5) that the Defendants sold portions of the plot of land in contention without the consent of the Petitioner. The receipts and letter of allocation signed by the 1st Defendant and the receipts of payment issued to them by the 1st and 2nd Defendant were tendered as Exhibit “C”. PW1 stated that by virtue of memorandum of understanding, i.e Exhibit “F”, no portion of it permitted the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants to sell a bare land without the consent of the nominal complainant. Exhibit “C” are receipts issued by the 2nd Defendant to one Mrs. Kemi, Kolawale for the purchase of the portion of the land in dispute and equally contained letter of offer issued to Mrs. Kemi Kolawale by the 2nd Defendant (Kabriel Global Concept Ltd.) also in the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AND KAYODE GABRIEL ADENIJI & 2ORS 30