u*r-l:,' thot will oid his defence. documents counsel f or the Learned prosecution opposed the opplicotion f or odjournnrent contending thot the Defendant ought to hove come prepored becouse the court said so on the 6/3/20?3 thot the motter wqs odjourned to 14/3/?023 f or ruling on o no cqse submission. Notwithstonding the obje ct prosecution counsel ond made roised by the the pronou ncement I on 6/3/2023 when the motter wos odjourned motten on to 14/3/?023, I still odjourned the of the instance of the Defendont in the overall interest of justice f or continuation of heoring the cose of the Defendant. The -[ h]r rF lL.t"r r{Atil} V- U i*,,r Cgp] "FS*=-_=* $eN_.#_-. .rrr_--lLIlSfZ#{-;i EEDEIAI HtcH counF- wARRrfF.ELo er