,t-51/ it wos That the Defendont then responded thqt his sister friend's husband, the PW1 that bought the truck f or him. That he then saw PW1 within obout 2 to 3 doys .l and he wos told thot he wos the owner of the truck. At the close of the evidence of PW? in chief learned counsel for the prosecution cross exarnined him. The relevant evidence of PWZ under cross examinotion will be ref erced to loter in this Judgment. At the close of the Defendont's second witness evidence, leorned counsel for ' the Defendont Ir Victor Oruno applied for on odjournment to coll onother witness. Learned counsel fo CERTIFIEg TRUE COPi !.lyIV1-u1r..83.tu_.:x_ gGX -.€6..r r.d+ri rrr 't;ta;ft"-#ffi ,rclrr p6",8{ 31 'l he