ub\ Supreme Court in the cose of Darlington V. FRN Supro ond they a?e entitled to Judgment convicting the Defendant. f think the stotem ent made by the Defendant to EFCC which wos admitted in evidence without objection by the leorned def ence counsel Victor Oruno shows cleorly by necessory implicotion thot there wos o pretence on the port of the Defendont bef ore the P\4/1 parted with the sum of N2,495,000.00 to him. That the pretence folse qnd the Defendant knew that wos it wos false ond money obtoined by the Defendant from PW1 wos copoble CERTIFIED T.RUE COP} {A}rEV.:.11.. .#3.%s-*s,; ilcl{- lA?'E_.. FENEI Irr IL :a: HIGI{ WATRI A of being stolen. That Def endant