Commission (ICPC) pending the hearing and determination of the substantive case. Then at paragraphs 4.35- 4.45 of the final written address of the prosecution, he submitted that the administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 made provisions for compensation and restitution to the victim of the crime i.e the nominal complainant. He relied and referred me to sections 321 and 328 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015. Learned prosecution submitted that the words in section 321 and 328 Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 are clear and unambiguous and as such, where the Defendants are found liable, then an order of restitution of the property to the victim of crime be made as a consequential order. He relied on the case of AKINGBOLA V EFCC, (2012) 9 NWLR (pt1306) page 475 at 509. In conclusion, the learned prosecution urged me to convict the Defendants accordingly. The 1st Defendant filed his final written address on the 7th February, 2018 and a reply on points of law on 26th March, 2018. The learned Counsel, on behalf of the 1st Defendant distilled the following issues for determination:(1) Whether the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt against the 1st Defendant, the allegation of conspiracy to confer corrupt advantage upon relations and associates of the 1st Defendant by causing the title documents of plot SS1 Jikwoyi extension III to be made in favour of Pax Education Resources an unregistered company belonging to Patrick Pillah’s relations and associates? (2) Whether the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt against the 1st Defendant, the allegation that the Defendant used their offices to confer unfair advantage upon relations and associates of the 1st Defendant by 19