1997 – 2000 and that Plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III was a Plot applied for by Fine Trust Academy and Fine Trust Academy was allocated the Plot. PW1 concluded his evidence that he is not aware of the allocation of Plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III to Pax Education Resource Limited. PW2 was the resident Surveyor in Abuja Municipal Area Council between 2004 to about February, 2011. In her testimony, she stated that she was the Surveyor in charge of all Surveys and mapping activities within Abuja Municipal Area Council at that time and that they were colleagues with the 1st and 2nd Defendants working in Abuja Municipal Area Council and that the 2nd Defendant was her Senior colleague. According to PW2 while in the office the 1st Defendant brought an application for processing of his title deed plan in respect of a Plot in Jikwoyi. According to PW2 the application was not processed because when the file was brought to them, they followed due process to ascertain if the name of the person is on the list and they also checked the Cartography Department whether the plot in the file has been charted. PW2 testified that on checking the file, she discovered that the plot was charted in 2005 in favour of Fine Trust Academy as at that time and that a Plot can only be charted once and therefore the file could not be charted for Pax Education Resources. PW2 testified further that she then wrote or minuted that the Plot has been charted for another allottee. The two policy files of Fine Trust Academy and Pax Education Resource were received in evidence through PW2 as exhibits 5 and 5(a) respectively. Further, PW2 when shown exhibit 5(a), the policy file of Pax Education Resource Limited she testified that the application for allocation of the plot was made by P.T.A Nigeria Limited and the allocation letter was made in the name of Pax Education Resource. PW2 stated that the minutes in the last page of her colleague in exhibit 5(a) showed that the plot has been charted already in favour of Fine Trust Academy with File Number MISC 9764 and she identified the title deed on the last page of exhibit 5 being signed by her in 2005. She then testifies that when the title deed is signed it gives the allotee the right to the plot. PW2 then concluded her testimony by saying that it is not consistent for one person to apply for allocation and then the allocation of the Plot carry another person’s name. 3

Select target paragraph3