In summary, the applicant’s Case is anchored on the facts that the Respondents detain him from 9th – 20th of March, 2020 after he voluntarily submitted to the invitation of the Respondents made through a phone call upon framed offences that derived their inspiration from a civil contract for the supply of motorcycles between the applicant’s Company and Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs of an undisclosed state in violation of his Constitutional rights to personal liberty and freedom of movement guaranteed by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 {as amended}. Upon consideration of the all the processes filed by the parties pursuant to this application for enforcement of fundamental rights, I have formulated one issue for determination. That is:“Whether from the facts and circumstances of the Case of the applicant as presented before this Court, the Respondents have violated the Constitutional rights of the applicant to personal liberty and freedom of movement.” The application is brought pursuant to sections 35, 36 and 46 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Order 2 Rule 1 of the Fundamental Rights {enforcement procedure} Rules 2009, any person who alleges that any of his rights guaranteed under chapter 4 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 {as amended} has been or is being or is likely to be breached, may apply to the High Court for redress. 7