(2) There may be one person who is the hub around whom the others involve, like the centre of a circle and the circumference; (3) A person may communicate with A and A with B who in turn communicate with another and so on. The learned prosecution submitted that conspiracy is a complete act upon an agreement by the conspirators, and in most cases, agreement is inferred or presumed. He relied on the case of OSUAGWU V STATE, (2013) 5 NWLR (pt1346) page 366. At paragraphs 5.12-5.18 of the final address of the prosecution, he submitted to the effect that even by the confessional statements of the Defendants alone, the Defendants can be convicted of the offence of conspiracy punishable under section 25(1) (b) of the Act. The learned prosecution submitted that a confession is an admission stating or suggesting the inference that the Defendants committed that crime. He relied on the case of MUSA YARO V THE STATE, (2007) 18 NWLR (pt 1066) page 215. 21