2nd Defendant and Solomon Adakwu (now at large) the Bank Statements but the 2nd Defendant and Solomon Adakwu (now at large) insisted that their mission is to show PW1 the petition and documents contained in exhibit 3 and later he can discuss with their boss, Honourable Ndanusa, the 1st Defendant. Thus, from the testimony of PW1 and indeed PW2, exhibits 6, 6(a), 7 and 7(a) clearly lend credence to the fact that the Defendants and others now at large had different meetings involving two or more persons. It is also in evidence by exhibits 6, 6(a), 7 and 7(a), and the evidence of PWs 1 and 2, the Defendants and others now at large, by exhibit 3, their action or act was illegal and unlawful. Furthermore, the statements as contained in exhibit 3 is false and untrue. And by the evidence of PW2, Mohammed Idris, who sat in a vantage position of PW1’s office without the knowledge of the 2nd Defendant and one Solomon Adakwu that he is an operative of the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC), when confronted by PW2, whether they are officers of Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) the 2nd Defendant and Solomon Adakwu (now at large)were panicking from where they were arrested. In other words, by the evidence of PW2 and the confessional statements of the Defendants, the Defendants are not officers or operatives of the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC). 46