"Having met the preconditions, there is no impediment in the Evidence act that would pnevent the playing or demonstrating the contents of the already demonstrated DVD on any computer such as laptop projector and screen." In the same report, NWEZE JSC AT PAGE 27 held that: 'The impregnable juridical postulate of our adversarial jurisprudence prohibits a judge from embarking on an inquisitorial examination of documents outside the court room." is anathema for a judge to be allowed to act on what he discovered from such a document. In relation to an issue when that was not supported by evidence or was not bought to the notice of the parties to be agitated in the adversary procedure. IVIENAGBOR V BAZUWAYE (1999) 9 NWLR It (PT 620) ss2 AT PAGE 3L-32 PARA D-A the court held that: it is not the duty of a court to do cloistered justice by making an inquiry into the case outside even if such inquiry is limited to examination of documents which were in evidence when the documents had not been examined in court and their examination out of court disclosed matters that had not been brought out and exposed to test in court and were not such matters that, at length, must be noticed in court. On the other hand, their demonstration in open court would equally afford the opposition the opportunity of testing and contesting their accuracy in the usual adversarial method of cross examination. This omission has been heavily frowned upon by the apex court and as held in the case of DICKSON V SLVYA (SUPRA), INAKUOJU V ADELEKE 2OO7 ALL FWLR (PT353) 3 AT 2OO(SC)and OYENIYI V ADELEKE (2009) ALL FWLR PT 476) L9O2 AT 1912 that where a process of production of a contputer document has been completed, the cA.AS.40C.2022 t[. rii i rr I ! a t^i i! a1. t3 r r fttr PY L8 |Pog,e