pursuant to Section 84(2) and (4) Evidence Act were admitted in evidence as Exhibit X1, X2, X3 X4, X5 and X6 respectively. That all expenses were borne by the Defendant to be reimburse by Himma Abubakar. The DW1 also stated that he was not paid estacode for over 90 days he was in Ukraine. That was why he accepted credit payment from Himma Abubakar from Coscharis Motors to defray the money he owed the Defendant. It is the evidence that during the time the DW1 was making his statement to the EFCC and interrogation, he requested that he needed his lawyers to be with him but the EFCC refused and said he do not require a lawyer because they said they are not after human beings but recovery of money. DW1 urged the court to discharge and acquit him on the charge against him and order the EFCC to release to him all items including money collected from him by the EFCC. Under cross-examination by the prosecution’s counsel, the DW1 stated that he was never appointed to supervise the procurement of military wares but he was giving an 17