paragraphs. Court is urged to hold and discountenance the submission accordingly. Furthermore, there was no evidence on record to show that the $300,000.00 USD allegedly received by Khali Fertilizer company was for purchase of cars. Court is urged to discountenance the argument as unsupported by any admissible evidence in court. In response to the prosecution’s submission in paragraph 4.7 at Page 10, it is submitted that there is no admissible evidence before the court to support the prosecution’s argument that the Defendant was orally directed by the then Chief of Air Staff to liaise with Himma Abubakar, to see to the timely delivery of the military supplies. It is submitted that the vehicles given to the Defendant as alleged gifts were in fact, vehicles bought by the Defendant himself with the repayment of debts incurred on behalf of Himma Abubakar which he paid back by way of transferring credits from his personal account with Coscharis Motors to that of the Defendant. Court is referred to Exhibits S, T, W, Y6 – Y14. There is no evidence before the court to prove that the contractor bought the vehicles for the Defendant as alleged in the charge. 31