agent, the 2nd Defendant stated that he charges processing fees depending on the location of the property and same is not refundable. He stated that he is not a member of the Ad- Hoc Committee but I am an agent. Under cross examination, the 2nd Defendant stated that he never had dealings with Mrs. Sonia (the Nominal complainant) and had never seen her in his life. The person he had dealings with was the 1st and 3rd Defendants. He said the 1st Defendant came to his house in 2013 with men of special Anti Robbery Squad. He was shown the nominal complainant’s petition who had petitioned against him that he gave her stolen land documents. He was detained and he wrote his statement. He refunded money to the nominal complainant while in detention and surrendered his Golf car valued at N3,000,000.00. He refunded N500,000.00 at the Commission. He never saw Mr. Victor throughout the transaction and never had any dealing with the 4th Defendant. Under further cross- examination the 2nd Defendant stated that he is not a staff of Federal Capital Development Administration. He said he is a proxy agent of the Ad-Hoc Committee although he is not an appointed agent. He said it is correct that bidding had stopped since 2008 and that he collected money from the 1st and 3rd Defendants in 2011 to process and facilitate for properties. He said two forms (exhibits 12 and 12A) were purchased in respect of properties at Asokoro and Maitama for the nominal complainant. He said the form are free except indication of intent which is N10,000.00. He said no money was received by himself and the 2nd and 3rd Defendants in respect of these forms. On verification, the houses were no longer available and he did not give the nominal complainant any form to fill in respect of Gwarimpa houses. DW2 testified further under cross examination that N9,000,000.00 was given to him and the 3rd Defendant for processing of the properties. The 2nd Defendant stated that despite the fact that the processing fee was non- refundable, he was willing to give his land as collateral. The 4th Defendant as DW3 testified for himself and on behalf of the 5th Defendant. The 4th Defendant is an architect and also the owner of the 5th Defendant company. His testimony is that sometime in 2011 the 1st Defendant requested for the account 24