*****.t*-"* i ,(b) That the person so impersonated iby the defendant may be ,l ,- : .1... Iiving or dead -i'u (c) That the impersonation,or misrepresentation af identity was with a view to obtaining property or an interest in the property. Mr. Jiirbo argued that ,il;;U-ecution called PWt in proof of the elements of the charge and that there are different pictures of Henry Kingsley .who ,' the Defendant pretended',fo' be", and as such impersonating the identity of Henry Kingsiey to demand for the sum -' ",1 of '185 USD from air unsuspecting woman abroad. That rhe dant confirmed the printout by endorsing that they were printed ,J lris lphone 6, signed and dated all of thenr. Iie rcfori'ed t.lic to the Statements of the Defendant and argued that on the of the confessional statements of the Delendaut, ti-r,r , ,'i;';1,-,:-;r th9 ntrb4e from w-hich ',,thg , documents: were printed, that the 6 s o n has established the ingredients of the offence chargecl. 0 It is also his submission that the defendant's conlbssionai statements and the print out were admitted in evidence witliout an obiection together with the Iphone 6. Tliat confession a hec ancl voluntar;i by a person if direct and positive duly macle ancl satisfactorily proved is sufficient to grounct a conviction. Relied on ",, 'NWLR (Pt.' 734\ 666; , ,EMEKA 'v., T,HE STATB, (2001) 14 N\ryACHUKWU v. THE STATE Q002) 12 NWLR (Pt. TBZ!' a1 IJ