Charles (PW3) came and pick from the file in her possession on behalf of Richard. She further confirmed that the said Felix, who she claimed in her confessional statement, Exhibit P3, that she knew as a patient that used to come to the hospital; was the same person she saw at the ICPC office, who also testified in the case as PW2. I have carefully evaluated the Defendant’s testimony. All she attempted to do was to heap liability of the procurement of Exhibits P1 and P2 on a non-existent Richard Chinonso. Her testimony contained blatant tissues of lies and afterthoughts. I find it curious and incredible that the Defendant claimed that one Richard, who she had no prior relationship with, asked her to keep a file that 43

Select target paragraph3