, tAs or forced to mqke the up, threotened, coerced, obove stqtem ent ond it was odmitted in evidence without objection. The above statement shows cleorly thot the Def endant comrnitted the of f ence. If indeed it ;.s true thot the Defendont octuolly bought the compacting truck to dispose woste ond that PW1 sow the truck, of f ixed the church sticker on it ond prornised to give testimony in the church os contended by the Defendont in his evidence ond thot the truck wos put to use and ofter f ew doys, it broke down then why did the Defendont promise to refund the money in five instolments? UIERTIP t ien Tfue COtr .+ra F. R.r ;.6_ ,e.d I 42