2tb't'
hoving regard
to the existence of exhibit AZ in
with the hope thot he con cajole this
evidence
court ond get owoy with o technicol
Def
de
f ence. The
endont con cojole ony other court ond get
owoy with
it, certoinly not this court. Truth in
this motter is like o doy light,
it connot covered
by the Defendont. Why did the Defendonr poy
bock N400,000.00 ond promised
to refund the
bolonce instolmentolly
if
money f rom PWl by fols
e pretences? The judiciol
he did not obtoin the
time thot the court would hove used in ottending
to live cqses wos expended on o cose thot hos
i!
a.
1j
redeemoble feoture.
CERTIFIED TFUE
CTI'
xtuEY-:.tli-ffS€o;Hm.
slGll-
,lp
5 i..if #
lAfE-
trEnEiAt
rtrr1tr P !
I
t
47