exhibit 11(a) that the process was wrong for PTA to apply for land allocation and the allocation letter to come out in another person’s name that is, PAX Education Resource. Under cross examination by the learned prosecuting Counsel, I watched closely the 2nd Defendant as DW6 while responding to questions. The 2nd Defendant as DW6 testified thus:“I can see exhibit 15. Exhibit 15 is a replacement and PAX Education is not the first allottee. I signed the letter of replacement.” While the cross examination by the prosecution continued, I was watching closely the demeanour of DW6 especially when he testified thus:“I can’t remember which plot was allocated to PAX Education first before the replacement.” He also stated: - “An Applicant does not apply for replacement I am not aware of the application of the first allotment. I have not seen the 1st application for PAX Education.” Under cross examination, DW6 further stated:“There is no application form for Pax education in exhibit 18. I did not see the application form for land of PAX Education. I picked names of allottees by instructions from the Honourable Minister. I did not see the application form for land of PTA Nigeria Limited for forwarding to the Minister for approval.” Then when DW6 was asked under cross examination by the prosecution who gave him the name of PAX Education, he answered:“I can’t remember who gave me the name of PAX Education Resources Limited. Anybody can walk into Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) without application form for land and we can allocate land to the person.” Further DW6, testified under cross examination thus:“Patrick Pillah was the Secretary, Lands Committee. Patrick Pillah was also the secretary 45