find out whether it tallies with the request of the Police. We confirmed the names and then replied the Police. The two names i.e. Pax Education Resource and Fine Trust Academy were on the list. Pax Education was on SS1 and Fine Trust Academy was on Plot 1170.” Then under cross examination by the Prosecution, DW2 testified thus: “There are documents to indicate when the land was allocated. I was able to see the allocation letters of Pax Education Resource and Fine Trust Academy in the course of my investigation.” Further, DW2 under cross examination testified as follows: “I can see exhibit 6(a). I can also see exhibit 7(a). I saw exhibits 6(a) and 7(a) before writing the report. I saw the name Fine Trust Academy on Plot 1170 and Pax Education Resource was on Plot SSI and both on extension III.” DW2 is a blatant liar. By exhibits 6(a) and 7(a), both Pax Education Resource and Fine Trust Academy are on plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III. And by exhibit 7(b), survey plan, showed the beacons of SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III belonging to Fine Trust Academy and Fine Trust Academy was or never allocated plot 1170. Indeed, Pax Education Resource never tendered in evidence the survey plan showing the beacons and size of its purported plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III. Further, to confirm that DW2 is not a witness of truth, under cross examination by the prosecution when shown once again exhibit 6(a) and whether he saw the word “replacement” answered as follows: “I cannot remember whether I saw the word replacement or not while I was writing my report. I wouldn’t know the Plot that was withdrawn before issuing this one as a replacement. I did not find out the reasons for 51

Select target paragraph3