For ease of reference I shall reproduce Count one of the charge against the defendant. “COUNT ONE: That you Mary Okoh on or about February 29, 2012 within the jurisdiction of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory with intent to defraud did obtain the sum of N30,000,000 (Thirty Million Naira only) from Okon Amasi (Director, Mutual Alliance Property Development Co. Ltd) purportedly for the sale of a property at Plot 10, Federal Government Layout, Gwarimpa, FCT, Abuja under the false pretence that you own the said property which pretence you knew to be false and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1(1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.” The particulars of the above offence is that the defendant with intent to defraud obtained the sum of N30million from Okon Amasi purportedly for the sale of a property at Plot 10, Federal Government Layout, Gwarimpa Abuja FCT, Abuja under the false pretence that she owns the property which she knew to be false. Upon a consideration of the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses, it is only P.W.3 that gave evidence on the alleged transaction between the defendant and Okon Amasi. His evidence of the transaction is not an eye witness account. His evidence is a recount of the allegations in the petition (Exhibit 6). What is contained in Exhibit 6 are allegations which the law requires must be backed by proper evidence. P.W.3’s evidence is that Okon Amasi came to EFCC to adopt Exhibit 6 and made a written statement which was tendered and admitted in evidence as Exhibit 9. Okon Amasi was not called as a witness and was therefore not 12