revalidation and recertification. The Defendant, by exhibit 6(a) his additional statement, also admitted receiving the sum of N3,900,000.00 from PW2, Maryam Buba and not N2,900,000.00 for sale of the property L84 Dape District belonging to PW5. I however, observed that the Defendant in exhibit 6 states: “I prepared Power of Authority between Aminu Kofar Mata and Mr. Lamar Abba Gana Gadzama and registered it at Abuja Geographic Information System (AGIS) and appending my signature. The reason of preparing of this Power of Authority is to change or transfer Statutory Right from Mr. Lamar Abba Gana Gadzama and Aminu Kofar Mata to Lamar Abba Gana Gadzama. Lamar Abba Gana Gadzama authorized me to prepare the Power of Authority, to prepare the paper and sold Plot No. L84 measuring about 2,025 square meter at Dape District to Hajiya Maryam Buba at the cost of N2,900,000.00 and hand over the title documents for her.” In quick response to the above statement of the Defendant in exhibit 6, the learned prosecuting Counsel at page 8 paragraph 3 of her final written address submitted thus: “We submit with respect that the Defendant did not present any evidence to show that Lamar Abba Gana Gadzama authorised him to sell and we further submit that the evidence of PW5 and PW7 with the receipt of sale dated June 15th, 2005 attached to exhibit 1, there is no way Lamar Abba Gana could have authorised him to sell the Plot of land because as at 2009 when the Defendant sold the land in question to PW2, the land did not belong to Lamar Abba Gana. By the sale receipt 21

Select target paragraph3