blank cheque... so I therefore want to state that any blank cheque Liman brought to me, I seek Tunde’s consent on the amount to write on the cheque because he goes to the bank to withdraw the cheques” It is very clear from the above that Exhibit M corroborated Exhibits H1, K and L. In the light of the above, I am of the considered view that there was an agreement between the accused Ojeyinka Omotosho and others to commit the offence of conspiracy. It is instructive to state that the piece of evidence with respect to the exhibits was not disputed nor discredited during crossexamination of PW3, PW4 and PW5. Accordingly, I hold that the prosecution have been able to proffer credible evidence to warrant the accused person’s conviction on the counts charge of conspiracy. Now with respect to Counts 2, 3, 4 and 5 on theft. To prove the offence of theft, the prosecution is expected to prove the following ingredients: (i) Intention to be fraudulent (ii) The moving of the property (iii) Absence of consent at the time of moving the property. 23