- Okeke V. State {2003} 15 NWLR pt 842 p 25 - Chiokwe V. State {2013} 8 NCC 185 In the light of all the foregoing, it is the humble view of this court that the prosecution has proved all the elements of the offences with which the defendants were arraigned, that is criminal conspiracy, abduction and illegal possession of firearms contrary to sections 97 (1), 273 of the penal code law Cap. 104 Laws of Sokoto State 1996 and section 3 (1) of the Robbery and Firearms {special provisions} Act Cap. R 11 LFN 2004 respectively. It is trite law that where the prosecution has proved all the elements of the offences with which the defendants are charged, then the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. - Ajayi V. State {2013} 53 NSCQR pt II p 632 - Ikaria V. State {2013} 8 NCC 248 - Alabi V. State {1993} 7 NWLR pt 307 p 511 Consequently I resolve the sole issue formulated in favour of the prosecution and against all the defendants. Accordingly, I hereby found you guilty and convict you Alh Aliyu Jaye, Umar Muhammed Daneri and Baito Na Alti as charged. Court: ALLOCUTUS A Shattima Esq: The 1st and 2nd convicts were convicted on counts 1 and 2. They are 1st time offenders. They have been in custody since the 18/3/2019. We urge the court to take this into consideration in accordance with section 415 (2) (e) of ACJL 2019. The convicts are young persons and will not go back to a life of crime if giving the opportunity because they are 35