Alto --- met at Boto hill where we discussed that we should came out on Sunday and block the road that leads to Bachaka --- On Monday at about 0200hrs we met at Boto hill Iftimanere Alto was holding a gun a police type while Jaho was holding a machete, while I was holding a stick and a touch light. When a vehicle came, I was the one that flashed my touch light and stopped the vehicle, then Jaho and Iftimanere packed some properties from the vehicle but I don’t know the type of the properties they packed---.” In view of the foregoing, pieces of evidence adduced by the prosecution before this court, the question now is has the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the defendant in respect of the offence of robbery alleged against the defendant as required by law? Going by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Aliyu V. State {supra} earlier referred to in this judgment the 1st element for the offence of robbery, is that there was robbery. By the evidence of PW3, Pw4 and statement of the defendant which was admitted in evidence and marked as exhibit ‘A’ and ‘A1’ it is very clear that there was an armed robbery in February, 2018 along Gudu Bachaka road, in Gudu Local Government Area of Sokoto state. Consequently, I hold that the prosecution has the 1st element of the offence. As to the 2nd element that the robbery was an armed robbery, this court is also of the humble view that by the evidence of PW3, PW4 and the Page 9 of 12