statement from PW1 and then the Defendant made a statement, after she was arrested. PW2 stated that, after the defendant was arrested, she, the Defendant was then given time to report back to the police station, but, surprisingly, instead of coming back to the police station, after been given two weeks to reconcile the account, she went ahead to institute an action against PW1. PW2 also stated that the Defendant claimed that she was ill, and, thereafter, after her re-arrest, she, the defendant, was then charged to Court. PW2 stated that when the Defendant was given the extra two weeks for accounts reconciliation, she, the Defendant came back with her notebook, with which she, the Defendant did her own account. PW2 stated that the Defendant was employed, and, was in charge of daily sales, phones and accessories; and, then to remit to the account of PPW1. ,According to PW2, before the month of September,2019, she the Defendant told PW1 that she was going to school for her clearance, and, then refused to turn up for account reconciliation as requested by PW1. PW1 stated that during the reconciliation of accounts, the sum of N2,4S0,09Q= (Two Million, Four Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira was found missing in the account of the Defendant for daily sales, phones and other accessories, and, that the details are as contained in the charge sheet before the Court. According to PW2, during the investigation, the parties were given time, and later on, according to PWz, PW1 then informed her that the Defendant had given to her, PW1 the sum of N400,000, and, for which she recorded the said sum of money as exhibit, which was later released on Bond to PW1. The statement of the Defendant is Exhibit C before this Court, Thereafter, according to PW2, one Ogououmu Onyeka, who was an employee of PW1 made a statement to the police. The Statement of the said Onyeka is Exhibit D before this Court. PWz stated further that the sum of N2,560,000 (Two t\ilillion, Five Hundred and Sixty Thousand Naira only) which appears on the charge sheet has not been paid" Under cross examination, PW2 stated that she investigated this case, and, then put up an lnvestigation Report at the end of the investigation. P[W2 stated that the properties as mentioned in the charge are properties of pw1" - PW2 stated that PW1 gave to her receipts which are exhibits 41 A27. She stated further that Exhibits 412, A13, 418 and A24 bear the name Agowin, 7