He finally submitted that its trite law that a court order which capable of preventing law enforcement agency from conducting criminal investigation against a suspect reasonably suspected to have committed crime, is a creeping order like a weapon of mass destruction and a clear intention of preventing the law enforcement agency from discharging its statuary functions. - Uzor Kalu V. FRN {2016} LPELR 40 108 By the applicant’s averments in paragraphs 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 of the applicant’s supporting affidavit and re-echoed in paragraphs 14, 22 and 24 of the applicant’s further affidavit in response to the 2nd and 3rd respondents’ counter affidavit the applicant alleged that the 1st respondent influenced the 2nd respondent to arrest him on the 5/12/2020 and subsequently detain him until 7/12/2020 in lieu of his younger brother without any justification violation of his constitutional rights. In controverting the claim of the applicant, the 1st respondent by paragraphs 6, 7, 9, and 11 of his counter affidavit, averred that he reported a case of criminal conspiracy, assault and causing hurt to the 2nd respondent against some of the applicant’s family members because they injured some members of his household namely Asma’u Mohammed, Hadiza Mohammed, Muazu Bello and Farida Aliyu as well as damaged his gate and glass of his windows, having armed themselves with saw and sticks. It was his averment that the injuries sustained by the members of his household, necessitated him to take them to specialist Hospital, Sokoto for treatment, and in proof, 11