In the instant case, I have seen the submissions of the learned prosecuting Counsel at paragraphs 3.19-3.46 of his final written address and his reliance on exhibits 4,4,(a), 5,6,7,7 (a),9,10,11 and 22, the evidence of PWs2,3,and 4 and the voluntary confessional statement of the 1st Defendant and he submitted to the effect that the evidence of overt act of collusion by the Defendants exist to deprive the nominal complainant of his title in the plot allocated to him in 1997. The learned Counsel for the 1st Defendant at paragraphs 4.7 and 4.8 of his final written address referred me to the evidence of PWs1-4 and submitted that none of the witnesses even alleged conspiracy against the 1st or the 2nd Defendants and no cogent evidence adduced to establish the ingredients. The 2nd Defendant’s Counsel equally at paragraphs 3.14- 3.26 of his final written address referred me to the testimonies of PWs1, 2,3 and 4 especially under cross examination and concluded that the 2nd Defendant was charge based on mere suspicion. Firstly, it is important to note that the subject matter that culminated into the filing of the instant charge is plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III, Abuja. To prove the first two counts charge, the prosecution called four (4) witnesses. In his testimony PW1 stated as follows:“Plot SS1 Jikwoyi Extension III was a plot applied by Fine Trust Academy and they were allocated the plot of land. The allocation was done in favour of Fine Trust Academy.” PW1 testified that he was posted to Abuja Municipal Area Council between 1997-2000 as a land surveyor. PW2, worked also in Abuja Municipal Area Council between 2004 to about February, 2011 as the Resident surveyor in charge of all surveys and mappings. PW2 testified as follows:“I know the Defendants in this case. The 1st Defendant, Mr. Pillah, we were colleagues in the office at Area 11 and he also brought an application for processing of his title deed plan. 33