He cited ETIM V THE STATE (2020) LPLR-49667 r BELLO oKASHETU V THE STATE (2016) 15 NWLR (PT. 1534) L26t SUNDAY ANADUE V THE STATE (2020) LPELR -49669 (CA), RAPHAEL EWUGBA V STATE (2018) 7 NWLR (PT. 1618) 262. From the totality of the evidence assembled and evaluation of same, there is no doubt that there was a meeting of the minds of appellants and other gang members facing trial at another court. That the finding of the court was not perverse. ISSUE TWO He cited Sections 2, 3, KIDNAPPING AND 4(1) 7(L) & (2) of the DELTA STATE ANTIHOSTAGE TAKING LAW, 2OL6; JUDE oNWUZULTKE V STATE (2OL7) LPELR-41889, BELLO OKASHETU V THE STATE (2016) ls NWLR (PT 1534) L26, DANTEL NZEGBUNE V (2018) 11 NWLR (pr. 1631) 559, SUNDAY ANADUE V THE STATE (2020) LPELR49669 (CA), RAPHAEL EWUGBA V STATE (2018) 7 NWLR (PT THE STATE (2O2O) L26, SArDU HARUNA V STATE 1618) 262 which were cases from Delta State under this law. He reproduced the evidence of witness Pw1 for prosecution to show that kidnap has been proved beyond reasonable doubt, on the contention that it contradicts section 15 (4) of DSACJL 20L6, and submitted that the argument of Appellant's counsel did not emanate from the evidence adduce at the lower court. Counsel insisted that Exhibit Pt was not a mere transcription from Exhibit P3 and that Pwl's testimony bears witness in his cA.A5.40C.2022 7lPagc