That Prosecution did not comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 17(2) of ACJA. In his Written Address in support of the Motion which Counsel adopted as his oral argument, he canvassed that the Charge and the accompanying documents do not include the summary of statement of witnesses who testified in this matter. Section 380 of ACJA That Section 379 and were breached. The consequence of not complying is a striking out of the evidence of the Prosecution Witnesses. The Defendants were not given the opportunity of Legal Practitioner when their statements were taken. That the provisions of Section 17(2) of ACJA for the admissibility mandatory. evidence. of statements of the Defendant is Exhibits B, C, D are inadmissible in The Prosecution also adopted its Final Written Address filed on 11/04/18. The Prosecution raised the same issue posited by the Defendants’ Counsel for determination. 19