PARTICULARS: 1. The general rule is that the interpleader’s proof of ownership of a property being attached is on the interpleader. 2. However, where the property being attached is not in the possession of the judgment debtor the burden shifts to the judgment creditor to prove that the property belongs to the judgment debtor. 3. The vehicle GAC 35 2019 model was not attached in the possession of the judgment debtor, thus it is the judgment creditor’s duty to prove that it belongs to the judgment debtor. 4. The Respondent did not prove the vehicle has ever been belonged or belongs to the Judgment Debtor. 4. RELIEFS SOUGHT: i. An order setting aside the decision of the lower court delivered on the 29th day of September 2022. ii. An order allowing the Appellant’s interpleader application. iii. An order directing the Respondent to pay the sum of N5,000,000.00 punitive damages to the Appellant. iv. Any other order(s) of the Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance of this appeal. 5. PERSONS DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THIS APPEAL: 1. The Appellant, C/O: His Counsel S.G. Muhammad, Esq. Red Sky Attorneys, Kuka Medicals Building, No. 45, Tafawa Balewa Road, Nassarawa Local Government, Kano State. sgumel@nigerianbar.ng; 08033794149 2. The Judgment Creditor/Defendant/Respondent, Mubarak Murtala Zainawa Hadejia Road, 3