r;,f · I\ . You dro ped out of School b~cause of School fees? \ ' A. i I \ Yes. i1 Q. \ You are ram a very poor fa~ily? \ A. Yes. f Thus he Defe dant under Cross-E,x amination admitted his who I~ bio data 1s record d for him by the Police. How can a Police officer who does ~ot know he Defendant kno~ his bio-data as contained in Exhibit "C". No matte the level of the lice officer's ingenuity he cannot invent\bio-data of the Defendant. See the case of OKESHETU VS STATE 2017. NWLR pt. 1534 pg. 153 Pa ~\a H. . Pf rs \ . Again tW-2's te timony is pure and\ ~ndiluted. She gave both ratio~al and c9ncret~ answer t_o_ the. que~ t1ons put_ to he~ an~ was q_uite 1 posses~ed with , he suff1c1ent mtell1 : ence which sways this ~o~·r t into reception of her evidence. She -cried all through while giving evidence, giving tpe Court\ he picture of how the D~fen_dant killed her frie~d the deceas~d and s'outed under Cross- xammat1on when put that 1t was ri.ot eveh the De1 ndant that stabbed 1the deceased. Under dross-exa~ination the followin\g ensued I I 1 f q\\ It is not the\ efendant that kille . Favor A\ He is the on~ ! (Crying). \\ Htrtestimonies ! ·\ · 11 . , hich was in line w th the Defendant's confess:ion~I st tement Exhibi. "C" were also corroborated by the Defe17da~t m e idence, Defendimt's Confessional St,tement, Medical Report and . 1 1,Sl,IIT NO. 0/49c/2016_ : THE STATE VS CHIBUIKE DURU Judgment deuvered on\ 19/04/2018 1