~::
:•·
See SU~DAY A
ALA VS. STATE 2005 2 FWLR Pt . 270 at 220. TOBBY VS.
_
p TATE :~001 FW R PT 52 AT 2081. In t!his instance, the accused was
represe\nted by learned Co~nsel J.¢) o~:w ujekwe Esq. on 01/12/2016 .
1
yvhen Rlea was a ken. The Charge ~as {~ad to the Defendant by the :
registrar of the ourt and he ple'ad~d n¢t guilty to the Satisfaction of '
r1:.
this Co
The I
comp la r-ied ab
information. Fro
arraign ent as
arhed Defence Cou~sel did not at any tim~,qbjects or '
ut improper arraignment or non-service -.
;o'f :
. the records of thJ Court all the elem~nt~ ;of .irva!iid ' ;
enumerated above · w~·s strictly adhered to by this •
Court. his is the due process of law and it was strictly complied with in
the arr 9ignment of the Defendant. There was also no complaint with
regard t \o ·service of the informafibn dn t~ e Defendant. This objection is
alsc,ov rruled ..:
' ' _:.i i• ': ;; '
' , •··
'
,
,,
I
1
~~~t~e; , ·. or~, the Defendant COunsel 1a;~~~ ~bjeCtion in hi~ final WFitten
'
.
i
'
'
a;ddres:s on the a m-issibility of Ekhibit~ "A; C; D and (E"
OwEXhi its A and C ' . · .
.
i · ' d' ·
•
. .. ·.
·
I make aste to s ate that Exhibit"A" \sthe Sta_tementornw-l;tendered
01
by ,: th:eJ Defence Counsel himself
.1/?/2017 while he• was • cross:eJ<,liTlirri•~g the ·sad .P.W.L: He did not-sta _
t e;· his •ground of obj:¢c!Jon 'to
1
t hrea:dm\issib;ility \ fExhibit "A" : The c urtiijs •u nable ·to,see Wha:1: r'ender:s
the Exhilbtt -inad issible si·nce he did nc>"t state his ground ofthe said
o:b1·ectici>·h, .:This :cb urt cannot make a as:erfor-a party. This olJJection is
a1lso ove~ ruled . : \
· ' ·
I
1
0
"C"I.
T~en Exhibit .
is the confession I .. stat~ment. of the. De~endant
ij~mitted :•in .evicj¢nce, . It w~von .rf c~~d : that ~r.1al within ~nal was
00
t 1nducted in res~\~ct of t~e said ·Exhibits \ C by th'.s honorable 1=ourt on
B-~/5/i0,1·7, and r~.ling delivered on 2?{ 6/.·~-7 ., wherei_n ~he 5.,a.1d do_c~men.·t
vrs.ardmit:ted anQ marked a~· an Exh1bl1\'~~,-~~w th1.s·~court :1s now caUed
ll; oh to sit on ~ppeal ~n its own r~c1:1on h_avrng become_ Junctu~
o •ficiou:s - of the ~aid . ruling. There~ore,.: the instant obJect,on wit
t, p:ettto Exhibits_"A" and "C'' a'r'e herrbY 'overrulecj. ·. .
. ' ' .
11
. ·
,:
'
;~,! -j t i '
, •
;·
;, · r:1 · ·
·
s'u lT NO. 0/49'/2016: THE STATE
vs CHIBUIKE DURU
Judgment· delivered o~ 19/04/2018
.t. !~
r . , ,, , ,, .
1 ' ~~ .' ' • ~ ( ' '.
'
Page I 7
I
;., · 1, 1
I·
I I 1
.
I1
l · ..,
i--
r
'
(,11
1• -
,-:
I
·
, ,.
i i'
., .. -
I
I
,.