Ans. On the . 20 th February 2009, I was not in my shop . I came back around 5pm and I looked at my shop every where was scattered, etc. .. I then went down to CPS and I was making a report I saw him there, etc, etc, j, 1.\ ... The next day, I went to Area Command and I was making a report at Area Command, I saw him there again etc, etc, Under cross examination, the excerpts I had earlier quoted, took place. If these two answers given by PWl are taken together, it would only come to be that the incident happened on Friday. On that Friday, PWl went to CPS, the next day he went to Area Command and the next week he wrote the petition to Commissioner of Police. The date written on the petition is purely irrelevant. Even if it is, the IPO, would be in a much better position to explain or inform the court when the petition came to the office of Commissioner of Police. I cannot also but agree with the respondent's counsel that the petition having been received in evidence and marked as an exhibit, no other oral evidence can be added, subtracted or given on it. It is a trite elementary law. ~ "\ c-:\ 0t,-c_,Q_ ·!;_ __, - ~~~ tr r:..~ . - Let me make one or two comments on some of the judicial authorities referred to by all the counsel. I had the opportunity of reading most of them. In the case of of Ayorinde .V. Sogunro supra, the issue there, was a bit different from what transpired in the instant appeal. PW1 in this lSj f-' ;-; [:;P ..