14 PW1 under cross-examination stated that they requested 6 documents from the University of Ilorin which were all made available to them. Unfortunately, there is one vital document to this case, which has not been made available to this Court till the time of writing this judgment. That document is the one mentioned in (a) above by the complainant, that is, a duplicate copy of the statement of result issued to the accused person. Even Exhibit F dated 28th February, 2011 addressed to the Chairman of the EFCC, which variously stated in the letter that the accused person graduated with a third class honours, and which a copy of the University convocation and the accused person’s transcript was attached, still the copy of the accused’s duplicate of statement of result was not include. 2. I am duty bound to tell the prosecution and any person listening to this judgment that, the Serious allegation against the accused person in this Court is that he knew that he graduated with a third class degree, yet he presented a second class lower degree to the EFCC, which they employed him based on what he presented. PW1, who was in charge of investigating the accused person’s case and who testified in this Court on 27/03/2012 that he went to the University of Ilorin and met the Vice Chancellor and two DVC’S; the Registrar and the Deputy Registrar and according to him, when he presented the accused person’s result that he gave to them, the Vice Chancellor there and then rejected and said it doesn’t belong to them. The question is why the rush in rejecting the document? Why didn’t the Vice Chancellor call the accused person’s record for careful investigation before the outright rejection? I am astonished when PW1 testified that another result of the accused person’s colleague was brought and found it not to be the same with that of the accused person because that of the accused was tippexed; the character and the signature were not the same. That they certified that of the accused person’s colleague and gave to PW1. What perplexed me really is that PW1 did not say that a duplicate copy of the accused person’s statement of result showing that he graduated with