Substantiating the foregoing piece of evidence, PW2
also testified as follows:“After he left, I heard him shouting before he
reached the place calling my name “Jafar!
Jafar!! Come”. I then rushed to where he was
and found him in pool of blood and I asked
him who did this to you? and he said “it was
Bilal and other 3 persons.”
It was also part of their evidence that the deceased
died 2 days after he was admitted at Usman
Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital Sokoto.
Defence counsel at paragraphs 4.26 – 4.28 of their
adopted written address submitted that although
dying declaration is an admissible evidence as one of
the exception to the inadmissibility of hearsay
evidence where cause of death of a deceased is in
issue, she contended that the evidence of the 2
prosecution witnesses on the dying declaration of the
deceased is inconsistent because while PW1 says the
deceased said it was the defendant, PW2 says it was
the defendant and 3 others.
From the foregoing, one will be tempted to ask what
then is a dying declaration?
The Supreme Court in the case of Ezekwe V. State
(2018) 14 NWLR pt 1639 p 209 at 226 described
dying declaration as follows:“It is a declaration of someone at the point of
death, whose hope of life is gone when the
motive for falsehood is no longer there and the
Page 13 of 34
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents