internet which documents you claim emanated from the said Arnold Baggio with intent to obtain money from the ladies, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 22(2) (b) (ii) of the Cybercrime (Prohibition Prevention) Act 2015 and punishable under section 22(2) (b) (iu) of the same Act. On the AilA7P019 the Defendant was arraigned and a plea was taken with the Defendant pleading guilty to the one count charge. The matter progressed to hearing. The prosecution in an effort to prove that the Defendant committed the offence alleged, despite his plea, called one witness, chika uneke of oath testified to the (Pwl) who after the administration Defendantt arrest and all the effort and steps taken by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), followirrg the Defendant's apprehension, to establish the crime. Three (3) Exhibits were tendered through the pW1 as foilows: 1. statement of the Defendant, dated 2810612019 - adnritted Fll. as Exhibit 2. Document generated from sociar nnedial account admitted as Exhibit FJ2, 3, lTechno K7 phone, lTechno cannon, 1 Toshiba laptop and 1 MTN wireless device - admitted as Exhibit FJBa-d. The learned counsel to the prosecution urged the c*url to convict the Defendant based on his plea of guilt and the tffis fi,r,i': r" $)trilir; ** ., ri !P- SI{,i$t: