taking each toe off, one at a time. Aside of that, the Defendant himself had admitted to certain Offences, seeking at the end, the Option of Plea Bargaining. He was also very inconsistent and flipped back and forth within one version of one story to another, thus destroying their own defence. The Court therefore finds as follows: As regards Counts of the Offences of Criminal Breach of Trust, the Court finds as follows: COUNT 1-Guilty as Charged COUNT 2-Guilty as Charged COUNT 6-Guilty as Charged COUNT 8-Guilty as Charged COUNT 10-Guilty as Charged COUNT 12-Guilty as Charged COUNT 14-Guilty as Charged COUNT 16-Guilty as Charged COUNT 18-Guilty as Charged COUNT 20-Guilty as Charged COUNT 27-Guilty as Charged COUNT 29-Guilty as Charged COUNT 30-Guilty as Charged COUNT 31-Guilty as Charged COUNT 33-Guilty as Charged COUNT 36-Guilty as Charged COUNT 22-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 24-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 26-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 28-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 32-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 34-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 35-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 37-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 38-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 39-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 40-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 41-Not Guilty as Charged As regards the Offence of Criminal Misappropriation, the Court finds as follows: COUNT 21-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 23-Not Guilty as Charged COUNT 3-Guilty as Charged COUNT 13-Guilty as Charged 281