I' was committed by him, the prosecution has not made 0 ut 'r -1. $ee .'also the case and the prisonsr is entitted to an acquittal.,, . 'Aitorndy ' Genera,t Bendel trffioi 2 l{wLR ,otekt' v. (Pt.24)648 at 657 rparas. C-D,,. -..-.- . .r : In the instant case, the charge against the defendant is for fraudulent impersonation contrary to Section 22(2)(bxii) of the ; cybercrime (Prohibition Prevention etc) Act, 2015. 'It is tpertinent to reproduce the entire Section 22 of the Cybercrimes (prohibition, ,prevention etc) z\ot 20 i 5. i t s:;:te r; ii:j follciws: i (22),- (1) A person who is engagecl in the services of any financial institutio n and, as result of his special knowledge, a of its employ€r, staff, service providers and consultants with the intent to detraud commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonlnent for : a term of 7 years or a fine of commits identity theft '' ,r{ 7 - ;r' ' ,t', "' .: .'- i' _. : N5,000,000.00 or both, I. i (i) xperson who- ' (a) fraudulent .or, dishonestly makes use of the electronic signature, password or any other unique identilication n; or I ! {ilFFr t t" ,:. ,1: I t .qH) t: 18 ,.ii -,:1:i l