.-a printecl, the Defendant wrote and signed on it. After the documents were printed from the phone, Defendant was asked whether the documents belong to him and when he answered in the affirmative he was asked to endorse on Exhibit P2, made PWl testified that nobody a complaint against the Defendant but EFCC received an intelligence report on fraudulent activities, and that the intelligence report is i4 the case file. PWI testified that he does not know Henry Kingsley and Henry Kingsley did not make a statement to the EFCC. PWI has a,n email address r,vhich is not different from his name. pW1 testified that he didn't tell the Defendant thathe will release hirn if he admits to the orime. That he didn't present a plea bargain agreement to the Defendant. when shown a plea bargain agreement, pwl testified that he doesn't know anything about it. That he is an investigator and he fonvards his report to the legal department. It is important to state that a plea bargain agreement vyas later tendered in evidence by the Defendaat but was rejected and marked as such because it was not signed nor was it dated. PW1 testified that he got the Defendant's statement of account. That nobody's money was traced to Defendant's account, that no , amount of money was traced from Henry Kingsley to the Defendant's account. That Defendant dicln't obtain money from Henry Kingsley. That nobody complained to the PWI that the t - i.,- obtained money from him or her. i,.i -i' ). ,. sE5ii, i ,,.". I 5 o iiR-..;,