the present case, the issue of nominal complainant does not arise whatsoever, for the reason that the Defendant was caught in the act of the offence for which she was charged. By my understanding and reasonable inference from the totality of the evidence laid before the Court, the scenario relating to the instant Charge resulted from what is popularly known as a “sting operation” orchestrated by the complainant, that is the ICPC, following the intelligence report received by the Commission. The aim was to trap the Defendant and her cohorts who ran a racket that procures fake and dubious documents for willing customers who use the documents to apply for Indian visa. Unfortunately, this time around, the Defendant did not only walk into 53