or has dominion over property or money, misappropriates or convert same to his own use or disposed - of it in violation of any contract, express or implied, which he had made concerning the trust or contrary to the directive given to him or he intentionally allowed some other person to do same. ONUOHA VS THE STATE (1988) 7 SC (Pt. 74) at 93 – 94. In his defence, DW1 (1st Defendant) stated that the land was plotted into 15 plots and 3 were sold out to PW2, PW4 and PW5 in 2008 as agreed with PW6 prior to the existence of Memorandum Of Understanding i.e Exhibit “F”. It is also the evidence of DW1 that all the proceeds of the said sale of land were invested into the land. Pictures photograph to show how he compensated some indigenous people in the land, were tendered by DW1.. The law on documentary evidence is trite. Indeed, documentary evidence is a hanger to test the veracity of oral evidence. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AND KAYODE GABRIEL ADENIJI & 2ORS 40