necessary to corroborate the evidence of DW1 who said he paid compensation to them.. such corroborative evidence is missing in this case. Indeed, the intention of parties in respect of the transaction can be seen from Exhibit “F” (Memorandum Of Understanding) executed by both parties. As earlier stated in the preceeding part of this judgment, there is no clause in the Memorandum of Understanding aforementioned, authorising the Defendants to sell bare plots of land. From the sum total of the evidence put forward by prosecution, I am convinced that the prosecution was able to establish by evidence that the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants, being entrusted with property belonging to PW3 and same violated both the express and implied terms of Exhibit “F” entered into by selling plots of land from the land in issue and converting the proceeds FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AND KAYODE GABRIEL ADENIJI & 2ORS 42