individual’ purchasers of portions of the land are with the 1st Defendant who never remitted a dime to the Petitioner who is the owner of the land. Witness also stated that investigation further revealed that the Petitioner entered into and signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU Exhibit “F”) with the 1st Defendant through his company, the 2nd Defendant. He said no clause in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) allowed the 1st and 2nd Defendant to sell bare land to anybody and stated further that investigation revealed that contrary to the Memorandum of Understanding, the 1st Defendant sold portion of the Petitioners’ land without their consent and did not remit the proceed to them but misappropriated same, and that in the course of investigation, the 1st Defendant was confronted with all these facts and documents, and it was then that it was discovered that the 2nd and 3rd Defendants belong to the 1st Defendant; neither the Memorandum of Understanding nor the sale agreement empowered the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA AND KAYODE GABRIEL ADENIJI & 2ORS 5

Select target paragraph3