f ''-t
'l \-l''tV
(_
(3) Thot the pretence wos f alse
(4) The Defendont knew it wos f alse.
(5) Thot the property obtoined by the
Defendont is o thing copoble
of
being
sto I en.
5ee Darlington V. FRN (ZOtg) L?ELR 4SggO.
onwudiwe V. FRN (2006)
tO NWIR (pt. g}s)
t'
P. 382,
My Lords, opplying the qbove principle
of low to
the focts of the cese,I think with the orql ond
documentory evidence odduced bef ore the court
by the
prosecution
, they have proved the
essentisl ingredients of .the off ence
of obtoining
under f olse pretences os established by the
CERTIFIED TRUE CAIY
TAME
ilcx
_
;.ffi'Qc**
ilffir
s
.t-
IATE_-.
BEDENAL HIGI{
rrt X,. e W,
-
t*
\
O
39