7) 2, f think on this issue the prosecution hove t odduced suf f icient evidence to prove the essentiol ingredients of the offence of obtoining by fols e pretences to secure conviction. f n the f irst ?epresented instonce, the Def endont f olsely to PW1 thot he hsd controct with r: Rivers Stote woste monogement outhority which if the PWl invests, he will get N25,000.00 doily. Believing sum the Defendont , the PW1 poid aggregate of N2,495,000.00 in three instolments into the Defendont's personal bonk occount which the Def endant claimed was f or the purcho se of truck for the woste disposol controct. JERTIFIED ilApiE ilGN-. IATE-.. TRUt U Urt r.-53:ga*-=c. ..aa: FEDEiAL HIG WARRI ui7 F. a 51