1.(, J fire of cross exomination by I.M. Elodi Even under learned counsel consider for the prosecution thot f to be on expert on outhority in cross exomination in this court in criminol coses , the Def endont qdmitted paying the comploinont the sum of N4OO,OOO.OO exhibit C28 in evidence which is the nominol . See first bank monqger cheque. The question is why did n inql out of N2. 495.000 .00 A2 the balonce did loin co the false pretence? il.lMtV;4:..83a-*ilGll-€f-__. ,orl-,il::.'ijw* nEiiflRAL Htcit eOUpi-' ,.irAE,*, f &.d s o 43 N400 000.00 ond promised i n exhibit in ive instal the in riERtlrlED TRUE COF1 the Defendont poy the Plainti nts i he nder