lrt; division of the court thot it is no longer fqshionoble f or o counsel to p?esent allocutus for q convict. Thqt counsel connot give evidence from the bor thot it is the convict himself thot is enjoined to pres ent his ollocutus. f think o decision of the court in on off ence of this noture should oct os detercent thot froud does not poy . Moreso the convict hod opportunity to hove settled this motter omicobly with the nominal complainont. The convict here is o heortless University Groduote thot groduoted f rom University of Benin. JEFTIF|ED TRur COpl i{rMl V: rtr.*83* .-s" tlo}t-.Sf,_-_ 't'-"u{#ffi+ wA trn, Fl A* 0 89 the f omous